Terror As Anti-Union Strategy
The Violent Suppression of
Labor Rights in Colombia
by Anastasia Moloney
Bogota, Colombia — Gloria Ramirez knows only too well the dangers of being
a high-profile union leader in Colombia. Throughout her impressive 30-year
career in the trade union movement, she has survived an assassination
attempt and been forced into exile. She continues to regularly receive
death threats by phone, mail and the Internet. Once she was sent a
foreboding wreath with her name across it. The latest death threat was a
letter signed by the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC), a
right-wing paramilitary umbrella group, warning that her bodyguards would
no longer be able to protect her and her two sons.
An executive committee member of Colombia’s largest labor confederation,
the Central Trade Union Federation of Colombia (CUT), and former
president of Colombia’s most powerful teaching union, the Colombian
Federation of Educators (FECODE), Ramirez never leaves home without her
bulletproof vest. She travels in an armored car surrounded by the
watchful gaze of three bodyguards.
“In Colombia, threats are carried out,” she says. “I’ve survived so far
but I’ve been forced to live my life in a fragile box.”
Many of her colleagues at the CUT have not been so fortunate. Last year,
94 trade unionists were murdered, 87 of them CUT members. In the first
two months of this year, at least five trade unionists have already been
murdered in Colombia.
While Colombian President Alvaro Uribe is quick to emphasize the decline
in the number of trade unionists murdered and kidnapped during the last
four years, the government is less eager to point out that other forms of
violence against union members have increased since the start of Uribe’s
term in August 2002. The National Trade Union School (ENS), a
Medellin-based non-governmental organization and research center, has
documented a 50 percent jump in the number of threats to individual trade
unionists between 2003 and 2004, a 57 percent increase in arbitrary
arrests and a 16 percent rise in union members forcibly displaced.
“Overall the number of illegal acts committed against trade unionists
between the first and second year of the Uribe government increased by
62 registered cases,” says Juan Bernado Rosado, research coordinator at
the ENS human rights department.
Government armed forces are increasingly responsible for violations
against trade unionists, including arbitrary detentions, house raids and
harassment by state agents. Most notably, last August the Colombian army
killed three prominent union leaders in the northeast department of
Arauca.
Ramirez believes that this recent trend reflects a deliberate government
policy to stifle trade union activity and protest. “This government
continuously undermines the legitimacy and rights of trade unions and
attempts to tarnish our reputation,” she says.
Government activities have created an anti-union culture in which
violence against labor leaders and activists is tolerated and normalized,
according to Ramirez. “The network of civilian informants created by Mr.
Uribe, where people can receive financial rewards for information about
illegal activities and insurgent groups, has helped government forces to
selectively target individual union members and promote an anti-union
culture,” she says.
Agrees Janet Kuczkiewicz, director of trade union rights at the
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU), “The prevailing
climate of violence against trade union leaders, activists and members
has given rise to an atmosphere of anxiety amongst workers, who are often
intimidated or threatened during collective bargaining or strikes.”
Government agencies routinely thwart union activity, according to
unionists. In 2004, the Ministry of Social Protection, responsible for
labor issues, allowed few new unions to be formed and declared the
majority of strikes to be illegal, often citing “public order” reasons.
Unions say recent changes in labor law have made it harder for workers to
exercise collective bargaining and freedom of association rights.
Such restrictions might explain why only some 5 percent of Colombia’s
economically active population belongs to trade unions.
The introduction of new anti-terrorism laws has made it easier to
criminalize trade union activity. The ENS highlights the government’s
growing tendency to use these laws to limit and stigmatize trade union
protest. During the Uribe administration, an increasing number of union
leaders have been arrested on charges of “terrorism” and “rebellion.”
Last year, two high-profile senior union leaders from the oil and
agricultural unions accused of “rebellion” were arrested during
industrial action.
The ICFTU says that arrest and illegal dismissal of striking workers is
common, as the experience of hundreds of protesting workers from the
state-owned oil company, Ecopetrol, demonstrated last year.
Government attempts to privatize and re-structure the oil, electricity
and health sectors are seen by unions as yet another a way of reducing
their power and the number of unionized workers. According to the ENS,
when Telecom, a national state-owned telecommunications company, was
re-structured, it was “for the sole intention of destroying its union of
6,000 workers.”
The paramilitary threat
While over half of those who commit crimes against trade unionists cannot
be identified, it is the paramilitaries who most selectively target union
members.
Last year, the paramilitary AUC was responsible for 32 percent of all
violations carried out against trade unionists, according to the ENS.
The 13,500-strong force, made up in significant part of the sons of
conservative wealthy landowners, are natural enemies of trade unions.
They associate the majority of union members with subversive Marxist
ideologies and claim they collude with left-wing guerrilla groups such as
the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National
Liberation Army (ELN). Trade unionists living in paramilitary-controlled
areas live a perilous existence.
A menacing e-mail message sent in 2003 by the AUC to one union leader
from the Oil Workers’ Union (USO) reveals the attitudes of the
paramilitaries towards trade unionists and the growing trend of
threatening the families of unionized workers as well. “We declare all
USO union leaders and the children of the USO members to be military
targets,” the message said. “We have already started our actions against
the workers’ children.”
Paramilitary and other violence against unionized women has significantly
increased in the last two years. More unionized women, particularly from
the teaching sectors, are being threatened, murdered and forcibly
displaced. According to the ENS, attacks against unionized women
increased by 20 percent last year.
Ramirez says the paramilitaries target teachers not just because they are
suspected guerrilla sympathizers, but because teachers enjoy a high
status and influence in society, especially in rural communities. Many
teachers also become community leaders, defending the interests of the
poor and indigenous groups, making them more prominent targets. Last
year, the teachers union lost 38 members, 13 of them women.
The ENS sees increasing violence against women as part of a “strategy of
terror.” According to Bernado from the ENS, attacks against unionized
women are intended to raise the national fear level. “Men normally bear
the brunt of violence in Colombia,” he says. “Murdering women makes more
of an impact on communities, creating more publicity and terror.”
While teaching unions remain the worst hit sector, the CUT is also
concerned by increased persecution of agricultural workers, including
especially arbitrary and mass arrests, in the fertile farmlands in the
departments of Sucre, Tolima and Arauca.
A culture of impunity
To be a union leader in Colombia is to put one’s life at risk. On the
recommendation of the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights (IACHR),
the government has initiated a protection program that includes at-risk
trade union members. The program provides a checklist of security
measures, bodyguards, mobile phones and bulletproof vests. Although the
IACHR in its 2003 Annual Report praised the government’s decision to
continue with the program, it commented that “it is necessary to keep
improving this mechanism, and in some cases there have been problems or
delays in the implementation of the protective measures.”
Ramirez, who is also part of the program, says too many protected union
leaders are still being assassinated despite receiving some protection.
Perpetrators of crimes against trade unionists in Colombia act with
almost complete impunity. Although some 3,500 trade unionists have been
murdered over the last 15 years, only 600 cases have been investigated,
resulting in just six convictions. One component of the problem, say
human rights groups, is the collaboration of paramilitaries and
government armed forces.
The government justifies turning a blind eye to violence against union
leaders in part by saying that trade unionists are simply caught up in
the overall violence that is part of the internal armed conflict in
Colombia. Government officials deny that union leaders are systematically
singled out by government security forces or other perpetrators.
“We strongly oppose this view,” says ICFTU, noting that “over 60 percent
of death threats received by trade unionists last year occurred in the
context of collective bargaining or strikes.” Nineteen percent of trade
unionists murdered in 2004 were during periods of industrial dispute,
according to the ENS.
What remains undisputed is Colombia’s reputation as the world’s most
hostile country for trade union activity. According to the ICFTU, more
than 80 percent of trade unionist murders throughout the world last year
took place in Colombia.
Colombian trade unions face a difficult year. They will have to confront
urgent issues such as proposed government pension reforms and Uribe’s
controversial bid for re-election next year, despite a constitutional
prohibition on his seeking another term. Trade unions are also concerned
about high defense spending — which they say is at the expense of much
needed social investment, particularly in the areas of health, education
and land reform. The pending final negotiations regarding the Andean Free
Trade Agreement with the United States, which union leaders fear will
undermine workers’ interests in Colombia, will further strain the trade
unions’ relations with government.
Gloria Ramirez’s experience illustrates the plight of trade union members
across all work sectors and areas in Colombia. But it is also an example
of the tenacity and perseverance of union leaders in the face of
persecution. “I’m in the eye of the hurricane,” she says. “But if we all
hide away or leave, what will happen to the country and our fight for
social justice?”
Anastasia Moloney is a freelance journalist
Living in Colombia.
|