To the editor:

Official estimates put the cost of the police action in the Middle East at $15 billion or more annually. In the event of war, the cost could exceed several hundred billion. But, American cities are deteriorating, crime is uncontrollable, adequate health care unavailable for many. How is it possible for the United States to make these expenditures? Congress and the President are ready to declare war but insist on a reduction in domestic spending. Is the U.S. a strong nation, if an impasse or war with a minor nation must delay essential funding to renew our cities, overhaul education and provide adequate medical care to all citizens? If a military adventure would reduce most Americans to poverty, should we try to be the world saviour for the United Nations? It is time Congress and the President put aside political tirades and evasions and explain how a war in the Middle East is to be financed. Although assistance has been offered by other nations, obviously the U.S. will pay the major costs.

In order to defend the U.S. position vis-a-vis Iraq, the military forces will spend a prolonged period in the Middle East, under adverse and trying physical conditions. It would be a hollow victory to win on the battlefield and allow individuals and corporations to profit from a wartime economy that would be paid for primarily by low and middle income taxpayers. Who profits from dividends produced by the munition makers?

Americans must spend adequate tax money for purposes that serve the national well-being, rather than personal contentment and greed. Instead of mouthing "no new taxes," Congress and the President must construct a tax system that is, above all other considerations, fair as well as adequate to meet the justifiable needs of all citizens, of what should be an important world republic.

Frank M. Chambers
McDonough, NY